Tag Archives: Logic in Sequence

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

March 28, 2017

Justification & Eating Meat

Death seeks to survive as death. It twists our minds through the reactive content of maya where we believe in our hearts that we ‘should’ eat meat. 

It is an overwhelming reactive pattern that locks certain people onto a path of downward activity where they are merging closer and closer to identification with matter.

The justifications for eating meat are as elaborate as they are deceptive.

What happens, as I have observed over the years, is that as one progresses upscale through the discipline of correct principle they encounter the unravelling of the law of attraction in many areas.

As this happens the clouds roll in from the horizon as a slow breeze through the trees… a few leaves blowing down vacant paths. Then, the tall black clouds curling over the mountains coursing down the planes until they hit us in the face.

In other words, the healing crisis in full swing.

Ultimately we have the choice to re-experience on the mental level or experience the fervour of the force ten gale directly in our faces.

So how does this relate to eating meat then?

People generally follow either path, they seek resolution on the mental level where they free themselves in this area of consideration of these compulsive reactive mechanisms.

Or, they seek to harmonise the Middle Self with the Lower Self.(i) This is an appeasement process as the Middle self seeks to reactively perpetuate itself by a survival mechanism by lowering and merging this reactive pattern into the physical body of the lower self.

When this happens the fibres of the eye reced into the iris and the reactive patterns become identified with matter. Literally, the appeasement where the patterns are, for example;

I have to eat meat, I just can’t give up, I feel good, I only feel good, It’s what the body needs, everyone is doing it, if I don’t eat meat I’ll be victimised, all arguments are wrong concerning this, I’ve researched and this is what I’ve found….

This is but a small snapshot. Try adding intense emotive feelings to each of these as the people around us justify why this reactive pattern of the Middle Self needs to be appeased, lowered and merged into the Lower Self.

This characterisation could be found in many dissimilar patterns of reactivity. We have a compulsion. As we discipline the body; the Lower self, and the emotional patterns emerge for transmutation on the Middle Self. If we succeed, we then access the Higher Self where further dualities are encompassed and ultimately freedom in this area of consideration. 

When you read this do you feel; you’re totally wrong, I need this and my body needs this! Ask yourself, can you eat meat or not eat meat with the same degree of impartiality?

That, friends is the key to transmutation – recreating on the mental level. You’ll find that as you do, you’ll access specific memories in your life when this exact pattern was encoded.

We can then reflect back and ponder….  was I living a lie? The separation of what is vs what is not, becomes clear..

The irony here is that a person whom is free of this duality is free to choose either path with the same degree of impartiality. 

Remember the danger of following advice of anyone know matter how qualified they appear on the surface. Test their theories, can they freely choose with non-resistance, or are they locked into one side of this argument or the other. If you follow them, then you live their lie which is now your lie.

I might add, many people reactively don’t eat meat, also… consider, both sides of the duality.

Enjoy… and don’t be deluded by the reactive content of the human mind. 


Wagin, Day 0

(i) See generally; Book II Logic in Sequence – Lower Self, Middle Self, Higher Self.

Explaining “The List”

Explaining “The List”

Consider, from acting out of faith, we apply the principles, or being virtuous. Then, through experience we come to knowledge. Rather than some sort of intellectual undertaking, experiential knowledge should be the benchmark in which things of this nature are measured.

Regarding ‘The List’, below is considered the underlying theme from which to operate from;


Consider below image, as we expand our awareness on the mental level.(i)

As we expand our awareness we move through a series of expansions of awareness. It is important when working on our list we start by completing things from a position of simplicity to complexity, this way building on successful achievements.

What is also important is to take off our list areas in which we have the ability to clearly visualise and have adequately mastered. For example we may put on our list to be a better person or a loving husband. Try and be specific and that way a practical way can be discerned in dealing with these situations.

This may not be possible to start with, but it is important to gradually become more in control of our lives, or being Yang. Moving from a victim role level where our ability to only visualise generally, or intellectualise in a given area is being considered.

Once we deal with this specific situation in more detail both from a physical, emotional and eventually mental perspective, we can then look back on the list an upon review find that yes, we have progressed in this area and this item can now be taken off. The phrase ‘it is good” resonates within us as we feel accomplishment in this area. Thus we acknowledge the source of creativity within.

This practical guide to dealing with life is simple yet highly powerful.

What it does not suggest in Dr Ray’s book is the use of a “mission statement”. In analysing this concept Morrison argues that this should be the case because the list is “less suitable for items which are of a more ongoing nature” and that these types of beingness positions should “remain indefinitely” on the list [ii].

Countering this position, it is argued that this is actually an intellectual position being taken, rather than approaching things from a hologramic perspective. Within Dr Ray’s material, particularly in Book Two of Logic in Sequence, it is clearly understood why this should not be the case. Consider ‘Desire vs Desirelessness’.

To the intellectual mind we are not capable of seeing through the veil of resistance and in our minds we are justified in suggesting, for example “I will never be good at this”, or “ I will never be able to master this”, and to us, we are totally justified and programmed to believe this to be the case.

Actually, we must approach this concept from a position of being willing, to recreate the resistance to be unwilling to be the effect, then move through the unwillingness to be the effect, and finally, being the effect.

Or, simply put, we are willing to be responsible for re-creating the resistance to the resistance of being the effect. All the “I can’ts”, “shoulda”, “coulda”, and emotional fear positions we take.

By taking the position of permanently putting the “mission statements” onto the list concept we dramatically limit the parameters of the concept. So much so, that the end product is actually the opposite of what the LIST concepts achieves ie – the continuation of resistance, as opposed to its resolution in the mental body.

Why, because in our own mind we are acknowledging that we will never be able to create or fulfil this mission statement.

Consider; if we desire something, yet at the same time believe or know we don’t not have what we desire, we continually create this concept of not having what we want. Thus, the position by Morrison is in fact diametrically opposed to what the List concept is designed to do.

If one were to follow this principle set out by Morrison in How We Heal then the outer effect would the perpetuation of resistance, comfort zones because as we admit to ourselves we will never be able to achieve a certain area of mastery, the universe responds with exacting precision and creates this environment.

How do we measure mastery? By the clarity of visualisation in a certain specific area. As yourself, can I see clearly in 3 dimensions with full colour and feeling? If so, then perhaps consider why it is still on the list. Remember – be specific. If we render our lives to a series of generalities, again, we will create this vague nebulous reality which we are never able to overcome, similar to reaching out and trying to grab air… as we reach out and squeeze, the air escapes and we left clutching at the air, literally.

As we overcome each individual resistance we expand our minds and horizon ad infinitium. This concept is very subtle yet needs to be rammed home so that false and misleading interpretations of principle are weeded out and thoroughly given the introspection they need.

As we come through a conservative victim role perspective where we are seeing through resisting eyes, rather than through the clear reflection of emotional and mental discernment, we believe and are totally justified in our thinking that we can never create that which we desire.

Morrison also suggests that the focus on the list is primarily on the “outer” world, rather than the underlying choices of beingness, which guide us through life. Again, any area we do not have mastery over should be on the list.

The underlying beingness is a moment by moment choice, that actually, can initially be put on the list also. However, if we acknowledge that we will ‘indefinitely’ never reach this achievement then, rest assured, we will not.

By focusing on the outer to the exclusion of the inner we will also create a pattern of identification with one end of the duality perceived to the exclusion of the other, thus creating a situation where we, by focusing our attention on the outer, we perpetuate it.

Because we are identified with one side of a duality and acknowledge that the other side is beyond our grasp we then create, either from the mental level, or through resistance, the continuation of the resistance, or the non-completion of the desired ‘mission statement’.

It is paramount to understand that when we exclude one side of a duality in favour on another we create resistance which create our very belief systems that we are bound by. This in turns determines our choices which then create more pre-determine choices of beingness.

Thus, this brief summary seeks to amplify and accurate the List as a tool for karmic completion, not, the perpetuation of resistances as Morrison suggests.

The list is a tool of karmic completion which if done correctly results in a systematic resolution of duality on the mental level. It is not just a mechanical tool where we focus on the outer doingness. It is the attitude that underlies what we do that is f most importance.

Remember, “TO SEARCH FOR THINGS BEYOND OUR GRASP IS FANTASY”, start from the simple items first, encompass on the mental level.

The reality is that people are justified in seeing things the way they are programmed. Therefore, seek purification, over justification, then, eventually sanctification [iii].

I look forward to sharing more of my thoughts on the list, and answering any queries or counter arguments that people may have encountered. Through collaboration, reasoning and faith, we grow….

Through intellectual consideration alone, we trap ourselves into the effect of what we create in the first place…Remember, we must eventually assume the position of being yin & yang simultaneously to resolve the resistances and, to complete items on the list.

Enjoy & until then,

Jeremy Holt

[i] Ray, J. (1990) Book One, Logic In Sequence. Chapter 11
[ii] Morrison, D (2006) How We Heal. Pg. 300-301.
[iii] Ray, J. Visualisation and Consciousness Class, Step 1.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

October 12, 2014

We Need to Be Controlled

Jackie Chan, recently made the statement: ‘we Chinese need to be controlled. If we’re not being controlled, we’ll just do what we want.‘.(1)

This resistance pattern is something I believe is in the blood of most Asian people. Something which they feel deep in their beings.

Generally speaking, as referred to by Dr John Whitman Ray in Book Three of Logic in Sequence, particularly Chapter 29 there are four pathways of resistance we can follow. One of these pathways is the one pointed resistance to the effect where we have to be controlled, and through sheer force of will we choose with all our might that this is the case.

I believe Chan has uncovered the pattern that controls and dominates all Asian society in this doctrine of being controlled and the need to follow.

Whether this is Chan following state run mainland Chinese rhetoric or simply observing himself as a projection onto Taiwan or Hong Kong people is slightly unclear, but the former seems to be most likely, but is actually irrelevant. 

What matters, is people become aware and then transmute this pattern through the methodology described in the Logic in Sequence Series: Obverse, Receive, Re-create, Release,(2) and/or other similar methods of transmutation taught in other metaphysical theory.(3)

This pattern of being controlled, the need to follow, and to do so compulsively is what creates the regime that controls us. It is the outer manifestation our collective inner thinking.

The fact this pattern is coming into awareness is good, and the social activism taking place is Hong Kong is great as well. All that needs to happen is the willingness to be fully out of control and to be controlled, and the willingness to be the unwillingness to be the effect, as another example, and then, to recreate, take responsibility, and release this pattern.

Then we will see a permanent change in the thinking of those free thinking warriors determined to make changes and ultimately the freedoms will become reality for the people.

In summary, this rally and the series of previous rally’s against the controlling regime are good things. Just staying the course, whilst continually educating ourselves within how to release our resistances will change the external reality.

The outer must conform with the inner, as the outer is one with the inner essence as they exist simultaneously and sequentially, together. Once one’s attention is released from the outer condition it disappears back into he void.  

‘It is good to feel good about the good in one’s self; but it is bad to feel bad for the bad that should be destroyed’. – Bhagavad Gita, Verse 27(4)

Good Hunting!

Paris, October, 2014.

(1) ‘Jackie Chan is no friend to Hong Kong’s protesters’. (10th October 2014). The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/10/10/jackie-chan-is-no-friend-to-hong-kongs-protesters/ Note: This article in no way supports Chan’s position in being controlled. Instead it steadfastly opposes any regime or person that seeks to control people, or support such an agenda. And, seeks to disseminate this information so the people can use it to free themselves and destroy any regime that seeks to control them, and to reinforce the democratic process. 

(2) See Esp: Observe, Receive, Recreate, Release. pg 81. Logic in Sequence, Book Two, The Healing Crisis. (1994) Ray, John, Whitman.

(3) The Flame of Attention. Krishnamurti, J. 

(4) pg 141. Verse 27. The Bhagavad Gita. (2001). Yogananda, Paramahansa.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

October 7, 2014


Fallacy: When we have a person claiming to have knowledge in an area and then uses what is called ‘polarized identification’ elicitation of ones thinking and choices, this then creates a position where the person so affected is ‘controlled’.

For example, when one visits a Dr, or Homeopath, or any other therapist and they say – you have this problem, if, in the mind of the person it is either resisted, or, there is sufficient unconsciousness already to elicit a command, the person giving the instructions can do so with impunity.(1)

The issue is when people know this, and use it to control people, then you know there is a major issue which usually is resolved by decree(2)

The upside: When a person has knowledge and teaches people how to govern themselves through correct principle and lets them govern every choice they make, with the full acknowledge of self responsibility, then you have someone whom can be trusted as valuable source of knowledge.

The said person uses their experience and knowledge not for any agenda other than to assist those whom want to assist themselves and giving instruction on principles which they can choose to follow and then gain the experience for themselves through self discipline and application.(3)

I’ve seen a number of cases recently where the former is in play, I observed how they control people and thus have been inspired to write this brief note.

You can typically tell the former when they are only wiling to parcel out information one crumb at time, which is normally tied into some financial or control mechanism. 

Correcting this is quite easily done by researching the material found in books 1, 2 and 3 of the Saint Germain Foundation.

  1.  Unconsciousness, See Esp: Book One, Logic in Sequence. Ray, John.
  2. Saint Germain Foundation: www.saintgermainfoundation.org
  3. Visualization and Consciousness Class, Step 1. Ray, John: https://www.scribd.com/doc/94098063/John-Whitman-Ray-Visualisation-and-Consciousness

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

October 5, 2014

The Politics of Change, a Chinese Perspective

It’s been an interesting journey for China in the last few years since I wrote this brief post on my old Body Electronics group. I feel that a gradual, slow and sure will of people are making changes for the positive China.

It’s not just people in China but the world that are pushing together from a position of collective will to form a cohesive spirit of reform. A pebble drops into the ocean and it’s ripples travel to the far shores of the universe. It then starts the long journey back. (2)

I believe that we are seeing the result of the ‘Maharishi Effect’ in full swing,(3) when out of nowhere it seems as if Hong Kong is in crisis where the streets are full of people protesting for new freedoms.

My thoughts are that it is not the end game that is important, but that people continue to lobby for efforts of freedom from a position of them already being completed. (4) 

What I mean, is, to be sure that we are focusing from a position of new freedoms already having been completed in our minds. As, if we do not we then create it’s opposite through resistance.

Therefore, focus, through social activism for change, yet keep the eye into the consciousness to recreate and free the minds of mental resistance simultaneously. This we see the cycle of Yin/Yang being completed.

God Speed to Hong Kong freedoms, and may the freeing of resistance and combined activity of social change calve a new path of freedoms for it’s people.

(Original Post 24th March 2012)

There is a growing movement within the rise of social consciousness via the Internet in China.(1) The question remains; will we see an Arab spring movement in China? (- soon?) And, can this be stopped if it does happen?

I think times are a changing in China and with the rise of global awareness ‘within and out’ of Chinese authoritarian rule, things will meet a ‘critical mass’ of awareness and, change, where an inevitable revolution, will happen – namely, a Neo-Liberal movement, is on the horizon.

Perhaps we can see the horizon, but, we can’t touch it …. just yet.

How does the global effect of collective consciousness change ‘affect’ the minds of people within China?

In response to a comment from a reader:

I think you’re referring to things in a way of simply ‘observing’ the outer conditions of mankind, without a solution. Namely, in manner of simultaneously viewing the inner essence. We can point to the outer, and talk “about it”, but our job, is to recreate the resistance, firstly, then to make appropriate changes in the outer world.

Collectively as we rise up through the level of the effect, we naturally rebel against a system, which we are resisting, and creating, call it what you will throughout each decade, but the principles are the same.

The Internet, is the vehicle, of what I would associate with the “doingness” of the “collective consciousness” of a geo-specific locale. Or, to put another way, the medium of communication which has a preponderance at the present time. As with time, the medium will change, ie, from press, to the digital age… to what?

The trends and data show us that there are over 700 million Internet users in China. The question I have put out, is, when this critical mass of people starts to create a coherent message of change, when will it happen, which I think it may do, and, could it be stopped by the government, if it does.

Remember, we project our thinking into the universe, which, it reflects back to us. As we change our thinking, so does this projection change. If we are pointing to the effect, or outer world, as I’ve suggested, and we do not view simultaneously the inner essence, we actually perpetuate the outer condition….because, we are “resisting” it.

(1) The sacking of Bo Xilai. (Mar 17th 2012) The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/21550309
(2) Russell, Walter.Think. (2003) The First Principles of Business Ethics. 
(3) See Esp; Maharishi Effect. Marharishi University of Management. (https://www.mum.edu/about-mum/consciousness-based-education/tm-research/maharishi-effect>; Note that in the work of Body Electronics it is understood that the square root of 1% of a group relevant to consciousness change taking place then critical mass is achieved. Notwithstanding, if coherence is achieved through TM, then it has a similar effect, however consciousness change still needs to take place. In the later case we are seeing the inertia changed through coherence of exceeding the upper parameters of the wave cycle of vibration in this area of consideration. Simply put, if people change their minds on a mass scale then it is permanent, if is through collective meditation and/or manipulation, one can conject that this said consciousness change still needs to take place, however the choices are arguably available, and achievable and maintainable through TM. Although TM is a form of Jhanic meditation(meditation with Seed), if people able to view the effect whilst creating a cause, then resistance can be recreated and released, although this activity is more more complicated then the 'Healing Crisis'. Nonetheless, it is possible, as when we focus our attention on an ideal, the resistance to this ideal is brought to the attention to be transmuted.
(4) Ray, John. Chapter 11, The List. Book One Logic in Sequence.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

September 6, 2014

Be Free… Or Justify Why You Shouldn’t Be – Scotland Independence

Lloyd asserts that: “Freedom!” But for what purpose?”(1) – Freedom is not an end, it is a means in which ones expresses themselves. We can choose to simply ‘be’ free, or justify, why we are not. 
Anything else, not matter how subtle, or in this case neither subtle or, rather, so obvious is begs no comment, is not freedom, and therefore suppresses people into sub-servant control.
This is just pro-Empire/England rhetoric… It’s not that Lloyd is wrong, it’s that his comments are just ‘facially stupid’.

Oppression happens first when the will of the people is subverted from the freedom to choose.

Lloyd makes the case that Scotland are Oil starved asserting that they are a poor nation with little opportunity to progress, but for the control of England. Actually the opposite is true, when one frees themselves of the burdens holding them back they grow into a position of collective responsibility where by their choices they can then grow and exceed any pre-conceived ideas that maybe burdening them.

May Scotland take this opportunity to free themselves from the shackles of control and oppression, which not matter how subtle which hold a person of nation back into slavery of the mind.

Obviously Scotland have the ability to be free from England, as they once were.

(1) Lloyd, John. (19 August 2014). Reuters. <http://blogs.reuters.com/john-lloyd/2014/08/19/braveheart-theyre-not-whats-scotlands-problem-with-a-united-kingdom/?utm_source=Facebook>
(2) Logic in Sequences Series; Visualization and Consciousness Classes. John Whitman Ray