Tag Archives: communincation

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

September 6, 2015

On Camera Selection & Form

A creative shooter seeks gear that compliments his style. This governs how chooses his equipment. As a person whom lives by fire of experience, it is this alone which stands as the one true test of acceptability.

The corpus of his modus is that, any gear he seeks, is to manifest his idea perfectly, that is all.

1000 Days in Paris-1-4

Should his gear encumber her in any way this stops an idea from manifesting correctly, and she discards it in lieu if something more refined.

Refined means that the ideas in ones mind flow like an an encumbered river back into the sea as the tides change, there is no separation. 

Therefore, the ability to manifest our ideas is the test of whether the gear is suitable.

A creative shooter constantly assesses whether his idea is manifested as it appears in his minds eye. He seeks to make his own picture in the minds eye then project the through her veil of space and time into a medium which accurately manifests his pre-produced idea.

The argument of film and digital is erroneous to the creative mind as he sees only the result of his thinking being manifested correctly as it was first seen in his mind, or, an aberration of something thing which resembles, but is not quite his desired rendering.

A creative shooter thus encompasses all methods and forms in order to manifest his idea. All are treated with the same degree of equanimity and impartiality. The ultimate aesthetic is the aesthetic of mind, and he seeks to mirror this aesthetic in her outer reflection of his inner minds picture.

1000 Days in Paris-1-2

Arguments about form and outer imaginings are not something a creative shooter is entangled by, as he uses all forms, as is required to manifest his ideas.

Thus the maxim follows, that the form is only a reflection of the picture, as the true picture exists beyond its reflection, in the mind, the form is the outer imaginings of the still inner mind.

Thus the camera serves as the gateway to reproduce his idea onto her outer form, but the form is only a reproduction of the idea, just as a book is full of words which mirror the thinking of its author.

Paris, Day 553
Jeremy

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

January 15, 2015

Free Speech

The issues of free speech has been raised in the recent Charlie Hebdo attacks. What is too far? Should free speech be moderated in any way?

Free speech should not be moderated in any way, as, where does it then end?

Educational lobby groups, individuals, and collective institutions should focus their efforts on teaching responsibility of actions, not, in how to limit or abberrate our freedoms in any way.

People should be encouraged to be creative from the source within for the benefit of the collective all, but should be taught more about how our actions have a rippling effect as if we drop a pebble into a still pond.

Teach and encourage ethics, personal responsibility, and above all freedom or choice, expression and satire.

Freedom is a relative position justified from the position of the observer. As we uplift our consciousness and breach through successive layers of dualities we intern expand our awareness and uncover a new scaffolding of relative freedom.

The concept of freedom thus, is quite limited as it can only exist within certain parameters. Thus, we should encourage collectively, the uprising of further and further and newer and newer freedoms as we strive for resolution on our mental body.

The concept of freedom then is one in which, if we limit in any way we then stain the fabric of our hearts and minds and give in to those whom would seek to keep man meek and depraved in darkness. Thus, the relative concept of freedom, is absolute, in its relativity.

Ask yourself – is what I am doing, reading, participating in creating a situation where I am able to uplift myself and develop a higher state of beingness where I am able to consider more and more points of view, which is the outcome of our expanded awareness?

Or, are we submitting ourselves where we believe in nothing but the doctrine of some would be guru or dictator .. or some other religious icon or Caliph. I challenge you to overcome your justification and think for yourself. Are you a follower, or someone whom is able to have their own opinion and dreams.

Remember – as Walter Russell has stated:

‘Fear of thought and fear of change are the two great anchors which hold civilization back, and hold the individual back.'<1> ‘

‘Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth — more than ruin, more even than death. Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages. Thought looks into the pit of hell and is not afraid … Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the world, and the chief glory of man.'<2>

And, as could be no more adequately put:

‘At every crossroad on the way that leads to the future, each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand men appointed to guard the past.’<3>

‘The thinker has always been at an advantage over those who are content to be followers.’<1>

Enjoy the transmutation of falsity and the infinite choices available to the free mind.

de paris..

  1. Walter Russell. Think, The First Principles of Business Ethics. (2003)The University of Science and Philosophy, 10.
  2. Betrand Russell, Why Men Fight.
  3. See, esp: Maurice Maeterlinck.