Tag Archives: balance

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

September 6, 2015

On Camera Selection & Form

A creative shooter seeks gear that compliments his style. This governs how chooses his equipment. As a person whom lives by fire of experience, it is this alone which stands as the one true test of acceptability.

The corpus of his modus is that, any gear he seeks, is to manifest his idea perfectly, that is all.

1000 Days in Paris-1-4

Should his gear encumber her in any way this stops an idea from manifesting correctly, and she discards it in lieu if something more refined.

Refined means that the ideas in ones mind flow like an an encumbered river back into the sea as the tides change, there is no separation. 

Therefore, the ability to manifest our ideas is the test of whether the gear is suitable.

A creative shooter constantly assesses whether his idea is manifested as it appears in his minds eye. He seeks to make his own picture in the minds eye then project the through her veil of space and time into a medium which accurately manifests his pre-produced idea.

The argument of film and digital is erroneous to the creative mind as he sees only the result of his thinking being manifested correctly as it was first seen in his mind, or, an aberration of something thing which resembles, but is not quite his desired rendering.

A creative shooter thus encompasses all methods and forms in order to manifest his idea. All are treated with the same degree of equanimity and impartiality. The ultimate aesthetic is the aesthetic of mind, and he seeks to mirror this aesthetic in her outer reflection of his inner minds picture.

1000 Days in Paris-1-2

Arguments about form and outer imaginings are not something a creative shooter is entangled by, as he uses all forms, as is required to manifest his ideas.

Thus the maxim follows, that the form is only a reflection of the picture, as the true picture exists beyond its reflection, in the mind, the form is the outer imaginings of the still inner mind.

Thus the camera serves as the gateway to reproduce his idea onto her outer form, but the form is only a reproduction of the idea, just as a book is full of words which mirror the thinking of its author.

Paris, Day 553
Jeremy

Advertisements

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

January 25, 2015

Naming Conventions and the Law of Balance

Preponderant naming conventions shouldn’t change for the sake of it, as they should be changed by realisation only.

Why? Because changing the physical name does nothing to change consciousness, it simply masks what is already there, or creates an overlay to an existing overlay or illusion.

For example, do we change Mother Earth, to Mother – Father Earth?

Realisation happens as we encompass both forms on the mental level. Intellectualism is where we think changing the wording will free us.

By mastering what is already in front of us we have the window to the soul and ultimately realisation on the mental level.

Things are preponderantly expressed in their seeming expression of a male or female, but they are an illusion, anyway. Thus, duality is encompassed on the mental level, not the physical, changing the physical without a corresponding change on the mental level does nothing and in fact perpetuates resistance.

One might argue also, that legislation which differentiates or partiallizes people in anyway perpetuates the separation perceived in the minds of people. For example, when we try to act as a civil society that does not segregate, marginalize or ostracise people from any demographic in anyway, and by doing do, legislate that people from certain classes of society of given an automatic partiality, then, this perpetuates the very separation we are trying to resolve.

Consider all the legislative acts that partialize communities and people? Legislative reform needs to happen where, the entire population is benefited and protected and harmonized with full freedom, not to divide, splinter off and partialize.

The feminism revolutions put the female back onto  an equal playing field. Great, but the lobbyists now want to legislate an equal pay system for Women and a Women in work policy etc. I think the idea is great, but the execution is wrong. We need equally balanced legislation where both Male and Female is equal.

When anything goes against the laws of nature, problems will happen. Seek balance at all levels.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

January 15, 2015

Free Speech

The issues of free speech has been raised in the recent Charlie Hebdo attacks. What is too far? Should free speech be moderated in any way?

Free speech should not be moderated in any way, as, where does it then end?

Educational lobby groups, individuals, and collective institutions should focus their efforts on teaching responsibility of actions, not, in how to limit or abberrate our freedoms in any way.

People should be encouraged to be creative from the source within for the benefit of the collective all, but should be taught more about how our actions have a rippling effect as if we drop a pebble into a still pond.

Teach and encourage ethics, personal responsibility, and above all freedom or choice, expression and satire.

Freedom is a relative position justified from the position of the observer. As we uplift our consciousness and breach through successive layers of dualities we intern expand our awareness and uncover a new scaffolding of relative freedom.

The concept of freedom thus, is quite limited as it can only exist within certain parameters. Thus, we should encourage collectively, the uprising of further and further and newer and newer freedoms as we strive for resolution on our mental body.

The concept of freedom then is one in which, if we limit in any way we then stain the fabric of our hearts and minds and give in to those whom would seek to keep man meek and depraved in darkness. Thus, the relative concept of freedom, is absolute, in its relativity.

Ask yourself – is what I am doing, reading, participating in creating a situation where I am able to uplift myself and develop a higher state of beingness where I am able to consider more and more points of view, which is the outcome of our expanded awareness?

Or, are we submitting ourselves where we believe in nothing but the doctrine of some would be guru or dictator .. or some other religious icon or Caliph. I challenge you to overcome your justification and think for yourself. Are you a follower, or someone whom is able to have their own opinion and dreams.

Remember – as Walter Russell has stated:

‘Fear of thought and fear of change are the two great anchors which hold civilization back, and hold the individual back.'<1> ‘

‘Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth — more than ruin, more even than death. Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages. Thought looks into the pit of hell and is not afraid … Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the world, and the chief glory of man.'<2>

And, as could be no more adequately put:

‘At every crossroad on the way that leads to the future, each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand men appointed to guard the past.’<3>

‘The thinker has always been at an advantage over those who are content to be followers.’<1>

Enjoy the transmutation of falsity and the infinite choices available to the free mind.

de paris..

  1. Walter Russell. Think, The First Principles of Business Ethics. (2003)The University of Science and Philosophy, 10.
  2. Betrand Russell, Why Men Fight.
  3. See, esp: Maurice Maeterlinck.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

January 12, 2015

Intervention and it’s Consequences

The law of nature and ethics in human relations tells us, inviolate, that every action in the universe has it’s equal and simultaneous, and sequential, reaction.

Each empire that has sort to enslave another nation has eventually suffered the fate of having the enslaved rise up to slay it’s masters. France has had a long history on enslavement of other nations, and it’s own neighbours. 

The reality is that as the enslaved gain their freedoms, so then does the control start to shift from the masters control of their own nation. Great examples are both France and England where they have seen nearly all of their empire crumble to ash, and the subsequent influx of immigrants to then start the reverse takeover.

The recent attacks in Paris are an abomination, and all efforts should be maintained that people of all countries and nations are protected.  

The not so obvious conclusion out of this, also, is to simultaneously look for the root causation. This does not to appear to have happened. This, is a mistake.

By looking for the causation we can find out why things are occurring, make changes, and then the reoccurring wheel will slowly grind to a halt.

The critical question(s) that needs to be answered in order to arrive at the causative answer is:

In each and every transaction with people and or other countries of; economic, militarily, socially, or otherwise, how have both parties benefited? Are both parties EQUALLY benefiting? Is there an equal interchange of energy occurring where both parties are perfectly willing to exchange sides.

If there is and EQUAL INTERCHANGE then happiness will prosper for both sides of the equation.

If not, then imbalance will occur, and inevitably the universe will then need to correct this imbalance. The imbalance in some cases will cause tension and large amounts of violence as people seek to maintain the balance.

Has France tried to achieve this in her aims currently? One could argue on the most part, yes, and this would be true. 

The point, is, that all people and all countries should be asking their questions about each and every transaction, all the time as an ongoing maxim. Then and only then will be have ongoing happiness as each person is happy and perfectly willing to exchange sides.

Look for the causation, whilst taking simultaneous action to defend and protect oneself, and, make sure our individual and collection actions are balanced.

Footnotes

1. See Esp: The World Crisis – It’s Explanation and Solution. Walter & Lao Russell. (1984) p 57-58.


		

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

December 16, 2014

Allopathy vs Healing Crisis

The pathway of allopathy puts one into a never ending spiral of descending levels of balance. Each lower suppressed level worse than the next, and requiring more suppressive drugs to reach these successive lower levels.

The pathway of the Healing Crisis takes one through progressive levels of uplifting balance freeing one from the conditions entirely at the causation level of the mental body.

The uplifting healing crisis frees one in reverse order as to how symptoms are suppressed.

The pathway of the healing crisis therefore allows less and less dependence on the physical level, and instead seeks vitality from the source of sustenance within.