Category Archives: Politics

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

May 28, 2019

Lower vs Higher Law – Freedom of Press/Mind

Some have criticised Julian Assange as have the intent to circumvent security measures in order to assist the release of secrets. As opposed to being an independent recipient.

Legally this could be a valid argument – but there is another way to look at this.

The mere fact that the secrets exist in the first place means that there is something to hide, something that the public have a right to see.

Often we see things linearly where the only logic is what is presented to use as a Law – when is order for freedom to exist we often need to break a lower law in order that a higher law, being freedom, may prevail.

#assange #wikileaks #freedomofpress

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

February 4, 2015

Consent in the ‘Civilised World’

In the Western World consent stops at a certain level.(1) For example, a person is unable to consent to being murdered, assault causing bodily harm and grievous bodily harm.

What does this mean?

It means that the rule of law is made so that people in society live by certain rules and if one steps outside these rules, according to public policy, it is unacceptable and a reasonable punishment in-cues. 

Does Sharia Law exceed these boundaries?(2) I argue that it does.

When a person is not allowed to leave a religion, or be beaten or flogged to death for seeming moral or minor offences then we need to look carefully at this.

Sharia Law, therefore, in the Western World cannot be submitted to, or followed, as it would be likely that we could not consent to the offences in which it subscribes to.

Instead, Sharia Law itself should be outlawed as it infringes on the free agency and rights of the soul. It is an abomination.

On the other hand, the Islamic religion should be embraced from a moderate perspective inwhich does not follow such a barbaric rule of savagery.

Anyone submitting or trying to lobby for Sharia Law should be immediately charged under new laws which could be made to protect society from this barbarity. 

1. Consent <http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod3a/3_50_non_fatal/05_assaults_defence_consent.htm&gt;
2. Sharia Law <http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia_law&gt;

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

February 4, 2015

Political Opinions

The three things I notice about people, generally speaking across the gaffe of social media are:

1. All seem to be highly critical of the person, yet rarely have any comments to the agenda.

2. There seems to be much hatred.

3. No other solutions are offered, merely critique.

As I see it, this is resisting the experiences of life on many levels. As a practical way forward, this could adopted:

1. Focussing on principles, not personalities. We are all human an capable of making mistakes and even annoying others simply by our presence. If anything, we should first critique ourselves first, then, should we have some discernment, push ahead cautiously.

2. Avoid venting frustration and anger into others, as this anger, is merely a projection of our own weaknesses where we seek to justify our position, to the exclusion of self awareness and harmony.

3. Should one come from a position of responsibility and harmony, focus on principal. Try coming up with new, creative an exciting policies that can be lobbied to our representatives in both media and politics.

Enjoy, and good hunting!

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 24, 2015

Australian Aboriginals

Both sides need a willingness for peace, until then its foolery to think, that, just because the White man in ‘over’ slaughtering 98% of their people, then it’s ‘all good’.

Both sides need to be perfectly willing to change their positions, until the, there will be conflict.

White man is ignorant of his cause because he is unwilling to see the effect he has caused in the lives of others.

Black man is unwilling to see the state of their of position as justified in being a victim, or effect, they are ignorant of the state of their victimness.

White man is unwilling also to see that in the destruction of the social system he then assumes responsibility for the new social chaos.

Both sides need a willingness on many many levels, so that in a generation or so, harmony and a new order of reintegration and harmony can be tolerated and respected.

Willing to be the unwillingness to be the effect,(1) is the start.

The same could be said about any human relationship be it on an individual level or on a country by country, collective level. Things change when we change, ourselves.

Footnotes

(1) Willing to be the unwilling is described in detail in the Logic in Sequence Series. John Ray. Another way to explain this is simply, that we are adding insult to injury by resisting an existing resistance. Therefore, we become unwilling to even consider the fact that we are unwilling to receive. The healing crisis reverses this process, by firstly being willing to realise that we perhaps are totally unwilling to even receive.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 22, 2015

Intervention

The cost of intervention is one in which all sides need to be at peace with, to end. It’s all well and good for the interventionists say, oh well let’s pull out of the Middle East, there were so many mistakes, but it’s fine now.

This is stupidity at its peak, as, it shows no discernment of the opposing parties viewpoint. Have we considered if it is ok for them?

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 12, 2015

Intervention and it’s Consequences

The law of nature and ethics in human relations tells us, inviolate, that every action in the universe has it’s equal and simultaneous, and sequential, reaction.

Each empire that has sort to enslave another nation has eventually suffered the fate of having the enslaved rise up to slay it’s masters. France has had a long history on enslavement of other nations, and it’s own neighbours. 

The reality is that as the enslaved gain their freedoms, so then does the control start to shift from the masters control of their own nation. Great examples are both France and England where they have seen nearly all of their empire crumble to ash, and the subsequent influx of immigrants to then start the reverse takeover.

The recent attacks in Paris are an abomination, and all efforts should be maintained that people of all countries and nations are protected.  

The not so obvious conclusion out of this, also, is to simultaneously look for the root causation. This does not to appear to have happened. This, is a mistake.

By looking for the causation we can find out why things are occurring, make changes, and then the reoccurring wheel will slowly grind to a halt.

The critical question(s) that needs to be answered in order to arrive at the causative answer is:

In each and every transaction with people and or other countries of; economic, militarily, socially, or otherwise, how have both parties benefited? Are both parties EQUALLY benefiting? Is there an equal interchange of energy occurring where both parties are perfectly willing to exchange sides.

If there is and EQUAL INTERCHANGE then happiness will prosper for both sides of the equation.

If not, then imbalance will occur, and inevitably the universe will then need to correct this imbalance. The imbalance in some cases will cause tension and large amounts of violence as people seek to maintain the balance.

Has France tried to achieve this in her aims currently? One could argue on the most part, yes, and this would be true. 

The point, is, that all people and all countries should be asking their questions about each and every transaction, all the time as an ongoing maxim. Then and only then will be have ongoing happiness as each person is happy and perfectly willing to exchange sides.

Look for the causation, whilst taking simultaneous action to defend and protect oneself, and, make sure our individual and collection actions are balanced.

Footnotes

1. See Esp: The World Crisis – It’s Explanation and Solution. Walter & Lao Russell. (1984) p 57-58.


		

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

October 27, 2014

#OccupyCentral – Hong Kong

For the activists whom take a position of causal actions, knowing the effect is one with the cause, look know further than the work of Gene Sharp.

Gene advocates a position of freedom realization within ourselves, and thus, when achieved, the outer layers of non-freedom simply cease to exist, gradiently.

Rather than approaching things from a victim level and resisting the outer events of life Sharp’s work provides the platform for cultures around the world to gradiently release themselves from the shackles of oppression.

Footnotes:

  1. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/30/world/asia/objects-hong-kong-protest
  2. Gene Sharp. www.aeinstein.org

Tags:

#china #hongkong #occupycentral

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

October 12, 2014

We Need to Be Controlled

Jackie Chan, recently made the statement: ‘we Chinese need to be controlled. If we’re not being controlled, we’ll just do what we want.‘.(1)

This resistance pattern is something I believe is in the blood of most Asian people. Something which they feel deep in their beings.

Generally speaking, as referred to by Dr John Whitman Ray in Book Three of Logic in Sequence, particularly Chapter 29 there are four pathways of resistance we can follow. One of these pathways is the one pointed resistance to the effect where we have to be controlled, and through sheer force of will we choose with all our might that this is the case.

I believe Chan has uncovered the pattern that controls and dominates all Asian society in this doctrine of being controlled and the need to follow.

Whether this is Chan following state run mainland Chinese rhetoric or simply observing himself as a projection onto Taiwan or Hong Kong people is slightly unclear, but the former seems to be most likely, but is actually irrelevant. 

What matters, is people become aware and then transmute this pattern through the methodology described in the Logic in Sequence Series: Obverse, Receive, Re-create, Release,(2) and/or other similar methods of transmutation taught in other metaphysical theory.(3)

This pattern of being controlled, the need to follow, and to do so compulsively is what creates the regime that controls us. It is the outer manifestation our collective inner thinking.

The fact this pattern is coming into awareness is good, and the social activism taking place is Hong Kong is great as well. All that needs to happen is the willingness to be fully out of control and to be controlled, and the willingness to be the unwillingness to be the effect, as another example, and then, to recreate, take responsibility, and release this pattern.

Then we will see a permanent change in the thinking of those free thinking warriors determined to make changes and ultimately the freedoms will become reality for the people.

In summary, this rally and the series of previous rally’s against the controlling regime are good things. Just staying the course, whilst continually educating ourselves within how to release our resistances will change the external reality.

The outer must conform with the inner, as the outer is one with the inner essence as they exist simultaneously and sequentially, together. Once one’s attention is released from the outer condition it disappears back into he void.  

‘It is good to feel good about the good in one’s self; but it is bad to feel bad for the bad that should be destroyed’. – Bhagavad Gita, Verse 27(4)

Good Hunting!

Paris, October, 2014.

(1) ‘Jackie Chan is no friend to Hong Kong’s protesters’. (10th October 2014). The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/10/10/jackie-chan-is-no-friend-to-hong-kongs-protesters/ Note: This article in no way supports Chan’s position in being controlled. Instead it steadfastly opposes any regime or person that seeks to control people, or support such an agenda. And, seeks to disseminate this information so the people can use it to free themselves and destroy any regime that seeks to control them, and to reinforce the democratic process. 

(2) See Esp: Observe, Receive, Recreate, Release. pg 81. Logic in Sequence, Book Two, The Healing Crisis. (1994) Ray, John, Whitman.

(3) The Flame of Attention. Krishnamurti, J. 

(4) pg 141. Verse 27. The Bhagavad Gita. (2001). Yogananda, Paramahansa.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

October 5, 2014

The Politics of Change, a Chinese Perspective

23/03/2011, Redux 08/02/2020

After writing this article in 2011 and now seeing the changing tides sweep through Hong Kong – I believe we are seeing the seeds for change which one ingested into the main hierarchy of the mainland Chinese, and critical mass of thinking perhaps will result in greater changer. 

— Consider the 100th monkey theory and morphic resonance. 

It’s been an interesting journey for China in the last few years since I wrote this brief post on my old Body Electronics group. I feel that a gradual, slow and sure will of people are making changes for the positive China.

It’s not just people in China but the world that are pushing together from a position of collective will to form a cohesive spirit of reform. A pebble drops into the ocean and it’s ripples travel to the far shores of the universe. It then starts the long journey back. (2)

I believe that we are seeing the result of the ‘Maharishi Effect’ in full swing,(3) when out of nowhere it seems as if Hong Kong is in crisis where the streets are full of people protesting for new freedoms.

My thoughts are that it is not the end game that is important, but that people continue to lobby for efforts of freedom from a position of them already being completed. (4) 

What I mean, is, to be sure that we are focusing from a position of new freedoms already having been completed in our minds. As, if we do not we then create it’s opposite through resistance.

Therefore, focus, through social activism for change, yet keep the eye into the consciousness to recreate and free the minds of mental resistance simultaneously. This we see the cycle of Yin/Yang being completed.

God Speed to Hong Kong freedoms, and may the freeing of resistance and combined activity of social change calve a new path of freedoms for it’s people.

There is a growing movement within the rise of social consciousness via the Internet in China.(1) The question remains; will we see an Arab spring movement in China? (- soon?) And, can this be stopped if it does happen?

I think times are a changing in China and with the rise of global awareness ‘within and out’ of Chinese authoritarian rule, things will meet a ‘critical mass’ of awareness and, change, where an inevitable revolution, will happen – namely, a Neo-Liberal movement, is on the horizon.

Perhaps we can see the horizon, but, we can’t touch it …. just yet.

How does the global effect of collective consciousness change ‘affect’ the minds of people within China?

In response to a comment from a reader:

I think you’re referring to things in a way of simply ‘observing’ the outer conditions of mankind, without a solution. Namely, in manner of simultaneously viewing the inner essence. We can point to the outer, and talk “about it”, but our job, is to recreate the resistance, firstly, then to make appropriate changes in the outer world.

Collectively as we rise up through the level of the effect, we naturally rebel against a system, which we are resisting, and creating, call it what you will throughout each decade, but the principles are the same.

The Internet, is the vehicle, of what I would associate with the “doingness” of the “collective consciousness” of a geo-specific locale. Or, to put another way, the medium of communication which has a preponderance at the present time. As with time, the medium will change, ie, from press, to the digital age… to what?

The trends and data show us that there are over 700 million Internet users in China. The question I have put out, is, when this critical mass of people starts to create a coherent message of change, when will it happen, which I think it may do, and, could it be stopped by the government, if it does.

Remember, we project our thinking into the universe, which, it reflects back to us. As we change our thinking, so does this projection change. If we are pointing to the effect, or outer world, as I’ve suggested, and we do not view simultaneously the inner essence, we actually perpetuate the outer condition….because, we are “resisting” it.

(1) The sacking of Bo Xilai. (Mar 17th 2012) The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/21550309
(2) Russell, Walter.Think. (2003) The First Principles of Business Ethics. 
(3) See Esp; Maharishi Effect. Marharishi University of Management. (https://www.mum.edu/about-mum/consciousness-based-education/tm-research/maharishi-effect>; Note that in the work of Body Electronics it is understood that the square root of 1% of a group relevant to consciousness change taking place then critical mass is achieved. Notwithstanding, if coherence is achieved through TM, then it has a similar effect, however consciousness change still needs to take place. In the later case we are seeing the inertia changed through coherence of exceeding the upper parameters of the wave cycle of vibration in this area of consideration. Simply put, if people change their minds on a mass scale then it is permanent, if is through collective meditation and/or manipulation, one can conject that this said consciousness change still needs to take place, however the choices are arguably available, and achievable and maintainable through TM. Although TM is a form of Jhanic meditation(meditation with Seed), if people able to view the effect whilst creating a cause, then resistance can be recreated and released, although this activity is more more complicated then the 'Healing Crisis'. Nonetheless, it is possible, as when we focus our attention on an ideal, the resistance to this ideal is brought to the attention to be transmuted.
(4) Ray, John. Chapter 11, The List. Book One Logic in Sequence.