Author Archives: Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

About Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

What I've found is that if you stare long enough into the void... eventually you see yourself starring right back ... until then.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 16, 2017

Land vs Spirituality

All humans are from somewhere else, back to time immemorial. The notion of one human having special rights over something because of their spiritual beliefs is selfish, and manifestly disrespectful to all other races whom have an equally legitimate claim.

Some abstract musings to keep you’all busy over your  taro latte.

Any partiality is always from a position of detriment to the other excluded parties. Thus, consider the perspective on encompassment – Nobody can claim rights over any land from a perspective of spirituality if you take it from the perspective in which the religion or spirituality is intended

Once we encompass duality at the mental level see that we are in both perspectives simultaneously and the original point of view is somewhat grosse.

Enjoy and encompass.




Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 14, 2017

More Parental Musings

Disciplining is about the parent virtually 100% of the time. The kids act outside the parents pre-determined ‘reactive’ parameters of acceptable behaviour.

The parents then tries to force the child through a variety…… of shall we say, ‘methods’, to conform to this pre-determined ‘reactive’ state. (Hi)


Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

September 5, 2017

The Racial Discrimination of the Racial Discrimination Act(s)

The various acts around the world which have been legislating racial discrimination create the very thing they try to overcome.

At their core they try to achieve, for example, more rights for blacks, women, or any other downtrodden class of people.

They purport to make every race free, and equal. Yet, having stated this, they then identify races and classes of people that should have preferential treatment.

At some point we’ll look back and laugh at our stupidity.

A higher more evolved form of legislation should remove all reference to race, gender and any partialisation regarding one person over the other.

It should simply promote all people as one people, one race and one movement together, as one.

The feminist movement has become the male  movement which it so desperately tried to overcome. By resisting something, they have become it. By seeking power and control they do not seek equality, they seek control.

Seek the upliftment of thought where all partialness is resolved.


Darwin Sojourn



Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

August 12, 2017

Listening and, Not Listening to Children

I’ve noticed something quite intriguing about children and the way they adapt to people speaking to them.

Quite often is the case where parents repeats things to their children like; saying ‘Hello’… or ‘I love you’, it could be anything. We are teaching our kids to speak..

What I’ve observed, is that, if we take time to pause, ie – say what we want to teach them Yang, and then listen, Yin, we allow them to the time to complete the cycle.

In the stillness beyond time, space, matter and energy lies the void of conception of thought. There, all people are capable of any conceptual complexity. Children have a craving to know more and to understand more, this exists at this conceptual level.

Translating this desire into the physical parameters in which we are forced to all work within we first create using our Yang creative force, and then use our Yin female faculties to observe. 

As the mind has a framework to work within time and space the desire of the conceptual causal body takes form. Therefore, when we utter a phrase to our children I believe that this is similar to yelling something down a long steep canyon where, should we wait long enough, we hear an echo bounce back.

Thought, has a wave form and will bounce off the edges of the universe and eventually refold back to us.

Thus, when we speak to our children and take the time to listen, often they will speak back to us. There is no force, there is no effort, other then the effort to think something into life an say it.

Here is the interesting part of this, shall we say, conjecture.

If, when speaking to our child we continue to speak without allowing the time for the thinking to refold back to us we in fact meet the incoming refolded thought at 180 degrees out of phase, and drown out the incoming thought. In fact, the new incoming voice from our kids is cancelled out.

Think of it for a second; when we shout down the canyon we wait for the echo – correct? What happens if we do not wait – we shout into the incoming echo and drown it out and ultimately cancel out the incoming thought.

As the reflected echo bounces off the canyon wall it comes back in reverse, much like a pendulum that reaches it’s apex, is momentarily still, then comes back in reverse to the way it came. If the pendulum is met with an equal opposing force it is cancelled out.

Thus, is we try to speak to our children without allowing them the time to come back with an echo, as they learn to form words, we in fact will probably speak over them, cancel them out, and don’t allow them the opportunity for growth. 

Consider, be Yang, pause, and then be Yin. Create, be still, and allow the universe, or in this case, our children, to respond. Eventually we should learn to be Yin and and simultaneously. 

Marketing people sometimes refer to this period as the incubation period. As a creatives, they come up with an ideas, there is a natural pause period where things spring from the ether as the reflected Yang energies gather the momentum to come back with the opposite Yin counterpart. 

Remember, in all things there is balance.

There is a natural balance in conversation: listening and speaking. But, consider this, as the Yang creative energy in forming a conversation is compressed, the counterpart, or Yin, is far more nebulous and expansive, much like vapor is to a drop of water.

Thus, as we create a conversation, those around us will respond with a myriad of ideas based on this original Yang creative force. 

Therein lies the challenge, be Yang, and let you children respond in their own creative ways.

I’ve noticed this problem in the Western world. That there is an epidemic of people whom love nothing more than talking over those around them in a vain attempt to impose their wills. This is a rank amateur way to try to dominate those around them.

If someone cannot take the time to listen, offer then the chance, once, if they learn on the spot you might have a relationship – otherwise don’t allow yourself the time wasting experience of spending time with people whom can’t wait to talk over you. They do not care about you, if they did, they would take the time to listen.

Remember also, most people haven’t learnt to think – as you expand your awareness, by simply introducing a powerful Yang original thought people will respond around you to this original idea, by reflecting and manifesting your Yang idea into a Yin series of manifestations. Make sure you thoughts and motivations are pure — though.

Remember, lastly – thought is not the essence of power, it is a manifestation of power. The power which exists outside and beyond thoughts.

<– – RGQH – –>

Wagin Protocol


<1> For more insight into the ways in thought interacts with people in the Universe read the material as laid out within the University of Philosophy and Science founded by Walter Russell < > with the caveat to read only the material by Walter Russell in his original text. The motivation of those whom have followed and are now in control of this foundation need to be thoroughly questioned before their material is accepted. 

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

July 14, 2017

The existence of Freedom

Freedom, it is said can only exist within certain ‘bounds and limitations’.(1) 

But what does this mean?

Surely, freedom… is, exactly that. Freedom must be an absolute… isn’t it?

Or is it..

Freedom, if we focus on it, has within it the opposite, which is not being free.

That is, if we are identified with freedom to the exclusion of non-freedom. Therefore, if we are trying to be free and running away from something we trying to be free of, then we will create, through resistance,(2) the very non-freedom which we are trying to escape from.

Thus, freedom, in this situation can only can exist when we are in a state, where there is a situation being free from a state of not being free. Thus, no freedom at all.

What is the solution?

We must maintain a countenance of the willingness of being free or not free with the same degree of impartiality, whilst, simultaneously seeking to free ourselves of any restrictions. ie Desire vs Desirelessness. 

The Buddhists, whom, in my opinion only half understand the emptiness perspective seek freedom as emptiness. They are free because they focus on nothing, and even the concept of being free is simply discarded. But how is this true freedom. Emptiness is merely an escape from being full, or non-empty. 

In other words, the Buddhists are simply focusing on one side of a duality and have not taken the position of universal responsibility of all things being encompassed. 

Thus, freedom can only exist within certain confines and limitations of duality, but beyond thought, freedom most certainly exists to the degree we are able to encompass the dualities of life; ie being free vs not being free, emptiness vs non-emptiness.

Are we in a situation where we will always be forever learning? Perhaps, yes. But we can do so within the concept of ever expanding parameters of freedom, not from a position of perpetuating one small bubble of perceived freedom where we never progress.

Encompass the concept of being free, or not, with the same degree of impartiality. 


Wagin Protocol – 14 July 2017

(1) John Whitman Ray
(2) Resistance is where is focus on something and the do not want the other side, so we exclude it. ie we want to be loved, but do not want to be not loved. The problem is, that in our minds the resistance is what we focus on and create the thing we which do not want. Take this example explained further – I want to be loved, but because I acknowledge that I am not being loved I try to create something to solve the problem of not being loved. I focus on not being loved as the underlying pattern. No matter how much I focus on being loved I keep creating it’s opposite. That is until I can be willing to be both with the same degree of impartiality. 

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

July 2, 2017

Choosing your child’s school … interrogatories and postulates 

Where X is the demographic net worth and Y is the percentage of white populous a given demographic.

In the west we have a culture of immigration from the east.

In Australia, for example, 28% of the population is born overseas.(1)

This is very intriguing. 

What I have observed in the thinking patterns in Australia is a pre-disposition of compromise with our schooling.

I believe there is multiple overlapping theories one can apply in assisting ones kids develop.

Firstly we must have a willingness to overcome the ‘unwillingness to be the effect’ of the ‘fact’, that Australia is soon to be a nation of ‘everywhere else’.

In this regard, assisting kids to gain exposure to the multitude of cultures that are available now.

I submit however, that those that are predominantly pushing for a single race class will servely limit the child’s ability to overcome this predisposition to be the unwillingness to be the effect.

I see it everyday, entire classes and even work environments full of either all white males or white females. Admittedly this is a dying trend.

The point, is to embrace and to have the willingness to strive for a willingness to be the unwillingness to be the effect of these situations.

I believe there is an optimum overlapping, of balance of culture and demographic upliftment where we can … shall we say; have a creative environment for our kids to grow whilst overcoming the predisposition to seek compromise.

Australia is in a unique position where the future of our kids upbringing will be assisted where we can embrace culture from around the world.

I may further submit that; ‘in vain do we build the empire.. without first building the man'(2).

Thus I submit that we should seek our own balance, and beyond by expanding our awareness and letting the water seek its own level..

By holding onto isolationalist thinking patterns where we only associate with anglofiles perpetuates patterns the world left behind long ago.

This such an exciting time ahead.

I wonder what languages can be taught in schools, I wonder what exchange programs can be encompassed.

I wonder whom will embrace the facts and whom will not.

I might say also; that I abhor the statement such as ‘this is un-Australian’… have you ever heard this in your own country?

It is a justification by the masses to perpetuate the status quo. This should be earmarked for chopping down.

This is not to say.. the ‘civilised’ world should throw it’s rule of law to the winds; quite the opposite… however, I believe you’ll find this statement is not used in this manner.

Some contradictions in this article? Some challenging ways to think about things? 

What happens when the bubble of consciousness bursts? We expand our minds and hearts to a new collective higher way of thinking.



(1) Australian Census <;.

(2) Markham; read in THINK by Walter Russell.