Monthly Archives: July 2017

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

July 14, 2017

The existence of Freedom

Freedom, it is said can only exist within certain ‘bounds and limitations’.(1) 

But what does this mean?

Surely, freedom… is, exactly that. Freedom must be an absolute… isn’t it?

Or is it..

Freedom, if we focus on it, has within it the opposite, which is not being free.

That is, if we are identified with freedom to the exclusion of non-freedom. Therefore, if we are trying to be free and running away from something we trying to be free of, then we will create, through resistance,(2) the very non-freedom which we are trying to escape from.

Thus, freedom, in this situation can only can exist when we are in a state, where there is a situation being free from a state of not being free. Thus, no freedom at all.

What is the solution?

We must maintain a countenance of the willingness of being free or not free with the same degree of impartiality, whilst, simultaneously seeking to free ourselves of any restrictions. ie Desire vs Desirelessness. 

The Buddhists, whom, in my opinion only half understand the emptiness perspective seek freedom as emptiness. They are free because they focus on nothing, and even the concept of being free is simply discarded. But how is this true freedom. Emptiness is merely an escape from being full, or non-empty. 

In other words, the Buddhists are simply focusing on one side of a duality and have not taken the position of universal responsibility of all things being encompassed. 

Thus, freedom can only exist within certain confines and limitations of duality, but beyond thought, freedom most certainly exists to the degree we are able to encompass the dualities of life; ie being free vs not being free, emptiness vs non-emptiness.

Are we in a situation where we will always be forever learning? Perhaps, yes. But we can do so within the concept of ever expanding parameters of freedom, not from a position of perpetuating one small bubble of perceived freedom where we never progress.

Encompass the concept of being free, or not, with the same degree of impartiality. 

Enjoy,

RGQH
Wagin Protocol – 14 July 2017

(1) John Whitman Ray
(2) Resistance is where is focus on something and the do not want the other side, so we exclude it. ie we want to be loved, but do not want to be not loved. The problem is, that in our minds the resistance is what we focus on and create the thing we which do not want. Take this example explained further – I want to be loved, but because I acknowledge that I am not being loved I try to create something to solve the problem of not being loved. I focus on not being loved as the underlying pattern. No matter how much I focus on being loved I keep creating it’s opposite. That is until I can be willing to be both with the same degree of impartiality. 

Advertisements

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

July 2, 2017

Choosing your child’s school … interrogatories and postulates 

Where X is the demographic net worth and Y is the percentage of white populous a given demographic.

In the west we have a culture of immigration from the east.

In Australia, for example, 28% of the population is born overseas.(1)

This is very intriguing. 

What I have observed in the thinking patterns in Australia is a pre-disposition of compromise with our schooling.

I believe there is multiple overlapping theories one can apply in assisting ones kids develop.

Firstly we must have a willingness to overcome the ‘unwillingness to be the effect’ of the ‘fact’, that Australia is soon to be a nation of ‘everywhere else’.

In this regard, assisting kids to gain exposure to the multitude of cultures that are available now.

I submit however, that those that are predominantly pushing for a single race class will servely limit the child’s ability to overcome this predisposition to be the unwillingness to be the effect.

I see it everyday, entire classes and even work environments full of either all white males or white females. Admittedly this is a dying trend.

The point, is to embrace and to have the willingness to strive for a willingness to be the unwillingness to be the effect of these situations.

I believe there is an optimum overlapping, of balance of culture and demographic upliftment where we can … shall we say; have a creative environment for our kids to grow whilst overcoming the predisposition to seek compromise.

Australia is in a unique position where the future of our kids upbringing will be assisted where we can embrace culture from around the world.

I may further submit that; ‘in vain do we build the empire.. without first building the man'(2).

Thus I submit that we should seek our own balance, and beyond by expanding our awareness and letting the water seek its own level..

By holding onto isolationalist thinking patterns where we only associate with anglofiles perpetuates patterns the world left behind long ago.

This such an exciting time ahead.

I wonder what languages can be taught in schools, I wonder what exchange programs can be encompassed.

I wonder whom will embrace the facts and whom will not.

I might say also; that I abhor the statement such as ‘this is un-Australian’… have you ever heard this in your own country?

It is a justification by the masses to perpetuate the status quo. This should be earmarked for chopping down.

This is not to say.. the ‘civilised’ world should throw it’s rule of law to the winds; quite the opposite… however, I believe you’ll find this statement is not used in this manner.

Some contradictions in this article? Some challenging ways to think about things? 

What happens when the bubble of consciousness bursts? We expand our minds and hearts to a new collective higher way of thinking.

Enjoy,

RGQH

(1) Australian Census <http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/3412.0Media%20Release12015-16&gt;.

(2) Markham; read in THINK by Walter Russell.