Monthly Archives: January 2015

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 25, 2015

Naming Conventions and the Law of Balance

Preponderant naming conventions shouldn’t change for the sake of it, as they should be changed by realisation only.

Why? Because changing the physical name does nothing to change consciousness, it simply masks what is already there, or creates an overlay to an existing overlay or illusion.

For example, do we change Mother Earth, to Mother – Father Earth?

Realisation happens as we encompass both forms on the mental level. Intellectualism is where we think changing the wording will free us.

By mastering what is already in front of us we have the window to the soul and ultimately realisation on the mental level.

Things are preponderantly expressed in their seeming expression of a male or female, but they are an illusion, anyway. Thus, duality is encompassed on the mental level, not the physical, changing the physical without a corresponding change on the mental level does nothing and in fact perpetuates resistance.

One might argue also, that legislation which differentiates or partiallizes people in anyway perpetuates the separation perceived in the minds of people. For example, when we try to act as a civil society that does not segregate, marginalize or ostracise people from any demographic in anyway, and by doing do, legislate that people from certain classes of society of given an automatic partiality, then, this perpetuates the very separation we are trying to resolve.

Consider all the legislative acts that partialize communities and people? Legislative reform needs to happen where, the entire population is benefited and protected and harmonized with full freedom, not to divide, splinter off and partialize.

The feminism revolutions put the female back onto  an equal playing field. Great, but the lobbyists now want to legislate an equal pay system for Women and a Women in work policy etc. I think the idea is great, but the execution is wrong. We need equally balanced legislation where both Male and Female is equal.

When anything goes against the laws of nature, problems will happen. Seek balance at all levels.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 24, 2015

Australian Aboriginals

Both sides need a willingness for peace, until then its foolery to think, that, just because the White man in ‘over’ slaughtering 98% of their people, then it’s ‘all good’.

Both sides need to be perfectly willing to change their positions, until the, there will be conflict.

White man is ignorant of his cause because he is unwilling to see the effect he has caused in the lives of others.

Black man is unwilling to see the state of their of position as justified in being a victim, or effect, they are ignorant of the state of their victimness.

White man is unwilling also to see that in the destruction of the social system he then assumes responsibility for the new social chaos.

Both sides need a willingness on many many levels, so that in a generation or so, harmony and a new order of reintegration and harmony can be tolerated and respected.

Willing to be the unwillingness to be the effect,(1) is the start.

The same could be said about any human relationship be it on an individual level or on a country by country, collective level. Things change when we change, ourselves.


(1) Willing to be the unwilling is described in detail in the Logic in Sequence Series. John Ray. Another way to explain this is simply, that we are adding insult to injury by resisting an existing resistance. Therefore, we become unwilling to even consider the fact that we are unwilling to receive. The healing crisis reverses this process, by firstly being willing to realise that we perhaps are totally unwilling to even receive.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 22, 2015


The cost of intervention is one in which all sides need to be at peace with, to end. It’s all well and good for the interventionists say, oh well let’s pull out of the Middle East, there were so many mistakes, but it’s fine now.

This is stupidity at its peak, as, it shows no discernment of the opposing parties viewpoint. Have we considered if it is ok for them?

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 21, 2015

What makes one a Global Mind?

Once one travels so far and wide they become aware of a parallel universe which the traveller journeyman or expat is part of. It is a sub culture that was always there, although slightly obscured to our vision, and never known until one has lived it. But, yes, it does exist, and it is that subculture that the traveller, from that point on, seeks out.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 15, 2015

Free Speech

The issues of free speech has been raised in the recent Charlie Hebdo attacks. What is too far? Should free speech be moderated in any way?

Free speech should not be moderated in any way, as, where does it then end?

Educational lobby groups, individuals, and collective institutions should focus their efforts on teaching responsibility of actions, not, in how to limit or abberrate our freedoms in any way.

People should be encouraged to be creative from the source within for the benefit of the collective all, but should be taught more about how our actions have a rippling effect as if we drop a pebble into a still pond.

Teach and encourage ethics, personal responsibility, and above all freedom or choice, expression and satire.

Freedom is a relative position justified from the position of the observer. As we uplift our consciousness and breach through successive layers of dualities we intern expand our awareness and uncover a new scaffolding of relative freedom.

The concept of freedom thus, is quite limited as it can only exist within certain parameters. Thus, we should encourage collectively, the uprising of further and further and newer and newer freedoms as we strive for resolution on our mental body.

The concept of freedom then is one in which, if we limit in any way we then stain the fabric of our hearts and minds and give in to those whom would seek to keep man meek and depraved in darkness. Thus, the relative concept of freedom, is absolute, in its relativity.

Ask yourself – is what I am doing, reading, participating in creating a situation where I am able to uplift myself and develop a higher state of beingness where I am able to consider more and more points of view, which is the outcome of our expanded awareness?

Or, are we submitting ourselves where we believe in nothing but the doctrine of some would be guru or dictator .. or some other religious icon or Caliph. I challenge you to overcome your justification and think for yourself. Are you a follower, or someone whom is able to have their own opinion and dreams.

Remember – as Walter Russell has stated:

‘Fear of thought and fear of change are the two great anchors which hold civilization back, and hold the individual back.'<1> ‘

‘Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth — more than ruin, more even than death. Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages. Thought looks into the pit of hell and is not afraid … Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the world, and the chief glory of man.'<2>

And, as could be no more adequately put:

‘At every crossroad on the way that leads to the future, each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand men appointed to guard the past.’<3>

‘The thinker has always been at an advantage over those who are content to be followers.’<1>

Enjoy the transmutation of falsity and the infinite choices available to the free mind.

de paris..

  1. Walter Russell. Think, The First Principles of Business Ethics. (2003)The University of Science and Philosophy, 10.
  2. Betrand Russell, Why Men Fight.
  3. See, esp: Maurice Maeterlinck.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry II

January 12, 2015

Intervention and it’s Consequences

The law of nature and ethics in human relations tells us, inviolate, that every action in the universe has it’s equal and simultaneous, and sequential, reaction.

Each empire that has sort to enslave another nation has eventually suffered the fate of having the enslaved rise up to slay it’s masters. France has had a long history on enslavement of other nations, and it’s own neighbours. 

The reality is that as the enslaved gain their freedoms, so then does the control start to shift from the masters control of their own nation. Great examples are both France and England where they have seen nearly all of their empire crumble to ash, and the subsequent influx of immigrants to then start the reverse takeover.

The recent attacks in Paris are an abomination, and all efforts should be maintained that people of all countries and nations are protected.  

The not so obvious conclusion out of this, also, is to simultaneously look for the root causation. This does not to appear to have happened. This, is a mistake.

By looking for the causation we can find out why things are occurring, make changes, and then the reoccurring wheel will slowly grind to a halt.

The critical question(s) that needs to be answered in order to arrive at the causative answer is:

In each and every transaction with people and or other countries of; economic, militarily, socially, or otherwise, how have both parties benefited? Are both parties EQUALLY benefiting? Is there an equal interchange of energy occurring where both parties are perfectly willing to exchange sides.

If there is and EQUAL INTERCHANGE then happiness will prosper for both sides of the equation.

If not, then imbalance will occur, and inevitably the universe will then need to correct this imbalance. The imbalance in some cases will cause tension and large amounts of violence as people seek to maintain the balance.

Has France tried to achieve this in her aims currently? One could argue on the most part, yes, and this would be true. 

The point, is, that all people and all countries should be asking their questions about each and every transaction, all the time as an ongoing maxim. Then and only then will be have ongoing happiness as each person is happy and perfectly willing to exchange sides.

Look for the causation, whilst taking simultaneous action to defend and protect oneself, and, make sure our individual and collection actions are balanced.


1. See Esp: The World Crisis – It’s Explanation and Solution. Walter & Lao Russell. (1984) p 57-58.