Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt

September 22, 2014

Pleomorphism vs Bacteria

With the discovery of bacteria by Van Leeuwenhoek in the 1600’s the scientific community now had something which they can identify with, and justify their points if view. This is further aided by the use of the microscope.
 
Absolutely these advances have been positive for all aspects of medicine.With this discovery one could argue that the polarization of the allopathic culture vs the natural alternative perspective is amplified. Why? Because, generally the allopathic regime seeks to find a solution by looking at the outer effect, as opposed looking inwards, to view the cause.
 

More consequences could be the fact that from a natural pleomorphic perspective alternative practitioners can use this as a springboard to be able to treat from a wholistic perspective, and as this is refined, and the internal environment changes, so, then, does the bacteria change.

So from a natural health perspective I think it is viewed from a totally different perspective, then allopathic. And, with it’s discovery, it can be used to enhance our understanding of pleomorphism.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s