Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 15, 2018

Illumination

In order to illuminate the darkness we must project light.

Advertisements

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 5, 2018

Light on a Canvass

..for Megan..

Light is akin to a pinhole in the sky… a point in space surrounded by a black canvass.

The light itself is contrasted and separated from the darkness to create the light.

The simultaneous inwards implosion is sequenced by the outwards explosion.

As the void is compressed into matter light shines and irradiates the darkness.

But yet the light is contrasted from the darkness. Not that the light comes from the darkness but as a duality when the light meets the darkness from whence it was contrasted from it voids and ceases to be.

Like all dualities that surround and permeate  time this first most simplistic duality is observed in the macrocosm as we look upwards to the heavens and see the light glistening of ages by.

As the light exists within time and space and is voided by the darkness that surrounds it the existence ceased from a position within time and space.

Yet the causal experience yielded, does not concern the position from inside time and space. The source of the conception is one of an informational conceptualised field existing as a scalar wave outside of time and space.

So the full experience and memories still exist of the afore light even if it shines no more.

1000 Days in Paris-22

Paris, 2015

The light is a reflection, if you will, or mirrored through the prism of time and space of our creativeness which exists time immemorial where there is no time.

Always look for the causal experience behind the Maya of experience and do not be distracted by the phenomena of light as contrasted by its own shadow.

The light permeates all things and lies within the secret of creation.

It is the essence of things. It is the essence of people.

If we stop and pause briefly.. we’ll see it.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

October 30, 2018

Right Action

When truly being honest we must ask ourselves if what we think we are ‘doing’ is correct.

Correct is somewhat misleading.

Of course there could be nothing ‘wrong’ with what we are doing at all.

Wrong in the sense that from an outward viewpoint the action we are embarking on appears to be legitimate and for a plausible reason.

Take this note, however ~ if what we are doing is acting out a reactive mechanism what we are in fact doing is ‘wrong’ from a position of logic.

What do I mean?

1000 Days in Paris-35

I mean you are not choosing to act – you are reacting.

By the very fact you are reacting you are bound and identified within the construct of the very act itself and cannot distinguish free will from the said, identification.

Thus what you are ‘doing’ is wrong, logically.

Think for a minute. Think about this. Consider, before acting whether we have made a simultaneous choice of beingness where we are totally impartial to the given choice of action.

It is always wise to consider whether we can ‘be or not be’, simultaneously, prior to doing. If we cannot be, then do, then surely we will never have.

Havingness if truly understood encompasses the idea of ‘not having’ – as logically you’ll see that the point is to be free of something, not to be bound by it. By being able to assume a position of not having simultaneously as well as having, we are freeing ourselves from attachment.

So perhaps we need to think again on whether we truly are correct?

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

February 13, 2018

Look to the Horizon, What do you See?

As I look out to the horizon..
What do I see?
I see myself starring back at me.

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 16, 2017

Land vs Spirituality

All humans are from somewhere else, back to time immemorial. The notion of one human having special rights over something because of their spiritual beliefs is selfish, and manifestly disrespectful to all other races whom have an equally legitimate claim.

Some abstract musings to keep you’all busy over your  taro latte.

Any partiality is always from a position of detriment to the other excluded parties. Thus, consider the perspective on encompassment – Nobody can claim rights over any land from a perspective of spirituality if you take it from the perspective in which the religion or spirituality is intended

Once we encompass duality at the mental level see that we are in both perspectives simultaneously and the original point of view is somewhat grosse.

Enjoy and encompass.

#fatwathat

RGQH

Reinhold 'Gaffa' Quisenberry Holt II

November 14, 2017

More Parental Musings

Disciplining is about the parent virtually 100% of the time. The kids act outside the parents pre-determined ‘reactive’ parameters of acceptable behaviour.

The parents then tries to force the child through a variety…… of shall we say, ‘methods’, to conform to this pre-determined ‘reactive’ state. (Hi)

RGQH